The result was keep. Notability established. Side note: The society is notable too. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Lack of WP:SIGCOV, does not meet WP:GNG. Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 11:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
*Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. I don't think sourcing supports NPROF#1, but I'm open to sources showing otherwise. Sources in article are primary, BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. Ping me if sources with WP:SIGCOV are posted, I'd like to see this kept, but absent sources a BLP shouldn't be kept. // Timothy :: talk 07:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Fellows, whose number shall not exceed 3000, will be elected on the basis of distinguished contributions to new knowledge and for promotion and application of Science & Technology for social welfare. They shall be elected on the basis of their scientific contributions in terms of documentation, publications, patents etc. However, everything being equal, special attention may be given to the women scientists. In case of scientists working in National Security Areas, e.g. DRDO/DOS/DOAE etc. their overall contribution to the progress of that field may be given special consideration.I think "whose number should not exceed 3000" is pretty strong evidence of notability in a country of nearly 1.5 billion people. But I'd like someone else to double-check since I don't have any prior knowledge of this society. -- asilvering (talk) 03:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)