The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Unanimous and obvious keep, based on arguments and precedence with referenced city articles. (non-admin closure) First Light (talk) 06:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bhadole[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no content, no references (of any relevance or value), does not explain why a small city in India is notable enough to warrant its own page, not enough content to be worth merging. besieged^talk 22:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep True that the article does not have reference. But it is a village with a population of 10,331 (please check under Hatkanangle subdivision in here ) and seems to have a post office. So it is notable.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Aren't inhabited locations inherently notable? References can surely be found, but the place definitely exists. Google Maps, in any case, recognizes its existence. Ratzd'mishukribo (talk) 02:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Village that exists and is thus notable per WP:NGEO. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.