The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article is short of good sources, reads like an promotional ad for a guru. No dedicated sources found and the only sources are indicating a reflected notability. Follow on previous AfD where no consensus was reached. (User) Mb (Talk) 12:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC) Delete No new sources published since previous AfD. See discussion on the previous AfD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bhaktivedanta_Narayana_(2nd_nomination) where no consensus was reached. (User) Mb (Talk) 12:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]