The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 01:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm not seeing significant coverage in independent reliable sources, and the article is borderline spam which appears to be created by somebody related to the subject as pretty much the same bio appears here. -- Whpq (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, RileyHuntley 00:57, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete Not notable. --Shorthate (talk) 16:52, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.