The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Cbrown1023 talk 19:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bill still[edit]

Bill still (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable bio / promotion for someone trying to push some highly original ideas for monetary reform. -- RHaworth 02:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: He seems to have many google hits, although its hard to sort out which are specific for him. If it is kept it should be redirected to Bill Still.--Dcooper 14:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 09:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but Stubbify and Rename to William T. Still. He does seem to be a notable conspiracy theorist, writing on other topics as well [1][2][3]. Most of the claims in here are unreferenced, however. Having poorly referenced biographies is a bad idea for anybody, but particularly for conspiracy theorists or other individuals holding controvercial or unpopular views. Rookwood^{Dept. of Mysteries} 14:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Also, how do we know that the TMJ/Hormone author Bill Still is the same person as William T. Still? Rookwood^{Dept. of Mysteries} 14:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, but on account of lack of attribution. --Dennisthe2 16:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't delete yet. Since there are not a lot of information on the web, I think the authors probably should reference more printed documents. I would suggest cutting out the non-referenced pieces, and leave what could be verified. I had to search for some related information today, and found this article. Though not perfect, I suggest not totally removing it, but just editing it down to some verifiable content. Boerseun 02:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Hi, I confirmed with Mr. Still that he is the author of the TMJ book. Those were his days as a freelance writer in the medical field. Regarding other issues surrounding this article, I've done my best to deal with them. Most of the people I told about the article put comments in its discussion tab. So if you could, also review that before deletion, as there are some points in there. Senatorj777 13:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete nn. Mukadderat 17:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.