The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bjoern Gantert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searched and can find nothing but primary sources for this photographer. Ridernyc (talk) 07:16, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Note Article creator has admited to what appears to be paid promotional editing here. [1] Ridernyc (talk) 09:40, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note - Please, read paid editing and I never admitted that and never intended to create articles that do not meet the wikipedia policy for my own profit. The nominator didn't show any guidance and also received comments from other editors for nominating articles for deletion without researching in depth. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Once again do you have sources? Ridernyc (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Note If you think the links given in reference section are not reliable then explain the reason on the debate. Please, share your views for proposing the deletion. Please, don't just comment that you didn't find any reliable sources etc. If the sources are found non-reliable or no reliable sources are added then admins will do the rightful for the article. Also, you'll not find me arguing with non-reliable sources. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 20:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Researched Bjoern Gantert and Björn Gantert for German or English sources. Found some, but no secondary sources that could reach the criterias on WP:CREATIVE. The article itself has only one sentence about his work, all others are about his Bio. --Ben Ben (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:GNG and research by Rider and Ben. Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:LOWPROFILE. NickAang (talk) 08:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, WP:LOWPROFILE describes people, who have been covered in reliable sources, but should not get an own article: WP:NOTWHOSWHO or WP:BLP1E. --Ben Ben (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.