The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Munster Senior League (association football). Mark Arsten (talk) 03:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blarney United F.C.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. I don't believe participation in the FAI Cup makes them notable. May just pass WP:NFOOTY but still fails WP:GNG in my opinion. JMHamo (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Think you may have made a small error here. WP:NFOOTY refers only to players, not clubs. The relevant subject specific guideline is the similarly named WP:FOOTYN, for which I believe the club notability guidelines are still valid. They do quite clearly state that clubs that have played in the national cup are assumed to meet WP:N. Fenix down (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It passes WP:FOOTYN as you point out, but I can only find a report about the FAI Cup 2nd round draw, no match report - I don't believe that this can be called 'significant coverage' to meet WP:GNG. JMHamo (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Munster Senior League (association football) as I don't think one match in a cup contested by semi-pro/amateur teams ie enough when it appears to fail GNG so comprehensively. Giant Snowman 17:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - Changed my view as per GS. No indication that the club have played more than 1 match in a national competition. A technical NFOOTY pass but a general GNG failure. Fenix down (talk) 07:47, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.