The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bloodless bullfighting[edit]

See also: discussion of article in Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 3.

Originally created back in June, this article was created as a self-promotional vanity page by User:Pebs96. It's unreferenced, and any Google hits that I've been able to find are either web pages created by User:Pebs96 or wikimirrors on the topic. The applicable information has been merged into Bullfighting, and when I redirected the source to Bullfighting per the GFDL, I was accused of vandalism. There was a lengthy discussion on the Conflict of INterest noticeboard here, where all of the claims to sources were laid out, and it finally came to light that there were no credible third party sources and that it would be better suited for AfD. As such, I've brought it here. Delete. fethers 20:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm sorry, but although I think this is a notable topic, the sourcing is horribly intermingled with the commercial relationship and original research of the main contributor. Until we have better, coverage as part of Bullfighting is appropriate. There are newspaper refs that can be used [1] as sourcing about the adoption of the Portuguese style in California. Tearlach 13:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's unsalvagable. The topic is addressed at length in Bullfighting#Portuguese. — Athænara ✉ 02:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.