The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, improved with sources and about to be moved. Guy (Help!) 21:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Springs[edit]

Bloody Springs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIR. This is not even a census designated place, it's just a random area with no sources other than a directory entry. Guy (Help!) 17:56, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 19:25, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Can't see any useful purpose in keeping this. Deb (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree. I am not finding anything to build an article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I am changing my vote per the comment by Dom from Paris. GEOLAND, which says "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low" or abandoned, is more appropriate than NOTDIR in this case.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• If kept, shouldn't the title be Bloody Springs, Mississippi?–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment could someone maybe explain something as I may have been labouring under a misapprehension. I thought that any populated place that is legally recognised met WP:GEOLAND. On the US Government source provided it states that the class is "populated place" and the description is "an official federally recognized name." This is why I marked it as reviewed without tagging. Would this not mean that it meets GEOLAND? Dom from Paris (talk) 22:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and move to Bloody Springs, Mississippi. It is a real place. I was able to add some things. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 03:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as it passes WP:GEOLAND and has been improved by other editors. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:03, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  I'll go along with that, but I agree with CaroleHenson that it should be moved to Bloody Springs, Mississippi. I believe there is potential for disambiguation to be required (see The Bloody Spring).Deb (talk) 12:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as it passes WP:GEOLAND. It can be moved, but that does not need to be decided at AFD. Bradv 18:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and move to Bloody Springs, Mississippi per above; WP:GEOLAND is met. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:02, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:GEOLAND Atlantic306 (talk) 16:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.