The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bluebell United F.C.[edit]

Bluebell United F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Unreferenced article about an amateur sporting club. No indication that it meets general notability guidelines. Lacks references to 3rd party sources RadioFan (talk) 15:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. 16:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - plays at level 4 in the Irish pyramid which emerging consensus indicates as the threshold for notability. The way forward is to add available sources and expand the page, not to delete. TerriersFan (talk) 18:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - as TerriersFan says, level 4 of the Irish football league is notable enough. GiantSnowman 18:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - if this is a notable level to be playing at, there should be 3rd party references where the team is the subject of the coverage, could you add some?--RadioFan (talk) 19:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Google News gives quite a few hits, mostly concerning their FAI Intermediate Cup final match against Crumlin. Bettia (talk) 08:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Level 4 team. BigDunc 20:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, appearance in the later stages of the FAL Cup pass notability in my opinion.--Vintagekits (talk) 10:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.