- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bobby Culpepper[edit]
- Bobby Culpepper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Of the 5 cited sources, three are obituaries (only one is actually his, and another is his self-published book. An additional search turned up no sources that would establish notability. GPL93 (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I can't find anything to suggest notability either. Cosmic Sans (talk) 20:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not seeing anything here. A politician who never held office, it seems? -R. fiend (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 03:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete another one of Billy Hathorn's unneeded articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing here is a strong WP:NPOL pass — it looks like he was only ever a local political organizer, and never an actual officeholder at any notability-conferring level of government — and the referencing is nowhere near strong enough to make him a special case over and above the thousands of other people who've done the same kind of stuff without getting Wikipedia articles for it. Bearcat (talk) 23:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.