The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lourdes 00:17, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Wealth Craig[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't establish notability. The references given are promotional in nature (e.g. The Statesmen article was written by "SNS Web"). Google search brings up 18 results for "Bobby Wealth Craig" and fewer than 100 for "Bobby Wealth", but not significant discussion of the subject in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 18:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The references given confirms the article's notability, also a newsletter like The Statemen will not put out any false information. GNews gave this information on him --Geezygee (talk) 20:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete and close - As per nom. Meeanaya (talk) 06:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - several sources provide coverage of the subject, but none of said sources lodge a credible claim to encyclopedia significance for the subject, nor are they particularly in-depth. Another major issue is that almost all of the information about Craig is WP:PRIMARY or based on primary information, a concern given WP:SIGCOV requires information to be intellectually independent of the subject to establish notability.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as self-promotional. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 02:32, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing to pass WP:GNG here. - ChrisWar666 (talk) 19:58, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.