The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boilerplate clauses[edit]

Boilerplate clauses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was removed by author and provided the sources. Still contains OR and possibly NOT content. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 22:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A Google Books search identifies at least seven books specifically about boilerplate clauses. Accordingly, this is a highly notable topic, and the article should be expanded and improved rather then being deleted. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  14:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Clearly notable per Cullen, but should be cleaned up and probably moved to the singular after the AfD is closed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.