The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour America Media Group[edit]

Bonjour America Media Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seemed like the TV channel, at least, could be notable, but I can't find any substantial coverage meeting WP:GNG, and definitely nothing for the media group that's the subject of this article. Largoplazo (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Largoplazo, I understand your request. I am currently adding lot of information about the channel and the group that represents an unique opportunity for francophones in the US to have french content television channel. We are broadcasted on Atlantic Broadband (channel 80), and we will be on Comcast, ATT, Direct Tv and some OTT platfom soon. You can also check the website www.bonjouramericatv.com. I will add an history section and programming section. Thank you Nicoobonjouramerica (talk) 22:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I appreciate your interest in the quality of the article. However, the issue is not that, but that article topics have to be notable, which largely consists of showing that they have received substantial coverage elsewhere first. For this discussion to less to a Keep conclusion, notability will have to be demonstrated. Largoplazo (talk) 00:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Largoplazo, I added sources and I think it can now be notable. This is a page about the media group and not the channel. The tv channel is Bonjour America. Thank you Nicolopezs (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two of these are press releases and don't count at all, as notability consists of independent signs of recognition. One of the other sources is practically a press release, as all it consists of is repetitions of what CEO Victor Romero said; in any event, it isn't a secondary source. That and the final source are fairly routine notices that a new company has gotten started. These aren't usually taken as signs of notability, as history is awash in companies whose creation is perfunctorily reported and about which nothing is ever written again. Largoplazo (talk) 19:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.