The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments czar 16:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bouyon music[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Those stylistic origins and derivatives sections never seem to be sourced. Anyway, that's a side-problem to the fact that this "genre" doesn't appear to be satisfactorily sourced and is another one of those millions of music genre articles here that are not supported by the literature. Coin945 (talk) 11:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC) "Withdrawn by nominator" per Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#The recent music genre AFDs--Coin945 (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 12:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Withdrawn by nominator" per Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#The recent music genre AFDs--Coin945 (talk) 14:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep One of a large batch of nominations made without competence or due diligence. AFD is not cleanup. Andrew D. (talk) 14:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.