The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:07, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Actually as far as I can determine it's not a bootleg but a studio album that the band released themselves rather than go through a record company. It was previously described and categorized as a bootleg by someone who misused the term. (See Bootleg recording). Regardless, I can find no coverage beyond file-sharing sites and even the band's networking sites say next to nothing about the album. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, this would qualify as a counterfeit album, an album of rare material/outtakes released without the involvement of the artists (material like the Beach Boys' Smile for example, has been widely bootlegged). If it even is a bootleg album, rather than the various songs from other albums, demos, etc. that might have been collected by a fan and posted on torrent/file sharing sites. The image posted as the album cover clearly seems to be the work of a fan rather than an actual album cover. (Sugar Bear (talk) 22:24, 17 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You are probably right. In any case, I think the end result of this debate will be the same! --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 14:12, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.