The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete & a liberal sprinkling of salt Nancy ^talk 17:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil of the north[edit]

Prod was declined. Student sport teams generally fail WP:NOTE criteria. There is zero coverage found on search. Player descriptions indicate this was written as a prank -- and could possibly be WP:G10 speedied as a BLP violation. — CactusWriter | ^needles 14:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — — CactusWriter | ^needles 14:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete WP:CSD#A7, so tagged - no indication that this disbanded student team was notable, no need for AfD. JohnCD (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Has already been speedy deleted twice. (Speedily!) University team in existence for three years. Article is student rubbish. Non notable. Is it possible to prevent a resurgence of the article? Peridon (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for mentioning those previous deletions -- I had failed to check the alternative capitalization. — CactusWriter | ^needles 16:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for closing admin- because of the multiple recreations and subsequent speedies, it is requested that this title be SALTED — CactusWriter | ^needles 16:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Non notable. DeMoN2009 16:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.