The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Again. --Coredesat 07:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bre Scullark[edit]

prod was removed by User:Badlydrawnjeff with the cryptic comment "reality contestents like this aren't capable of being "non-notable"." Certainly, a few losing contestants losers go on to notability. This is not one of them; after losing on the show, she finds herself just another struggling model and five years will be forgotten completely. I don't think we intend Wikipedia to be a Who's Who of losing game show contestants. Mikeblas 16:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. She was a finalist contestent on a major television show. Not much else to say about it, folks on America's Next Top Model are inherently notable. Beyond that, she was the cover model for a magazine, and seen by millions on the show anyway. Direct isn't all that cryptic. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Bre Scullark was on the "cover" of (and in a photo shoot for) mahogany-mag.com, a webzine with only one online issue. AFAICT, it does not have an ISSN number. Its "coming soon" website is ranked in the 740,000's by Alexa. -- Mikeblas 16:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • My mistake on the magazine. It's still worth a mention, however. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable L0b0t 17:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Expand article or Delete Same comment as other contestant above - Mention her in the Top Model article, but unless she's done something significant other than appear on Top Model, delete it. Dugwiki 17:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:BIO, see my reasoning below. Caknuck 20:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable. Edison 23:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Oh yes they are! -- Necrothesp 01:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• merge to the show website America's Next Top Model. Montco 01:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, just because there's a new type of game show ("reality show") does not mean that game show contestants are inherently notable, no matter how many millions of people may have briefly seen them . Wheel of Fortune is notable; it's contestants are not. As a finalist of a single season, she might deserve a mention in the show's article, but I'm not entirely convinced of that. Xtifr _tälk 08:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Her fifteen minutes is up. BTLizard 10:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Even those girls who have signed with modelling agencies may never get up to much. The subject does not appear to have capitalised on her 15 minutes fame, and without even the hint of a contract, is dead in the water. Having said the above, there is quite a lot of precedence for delete with redirect to ANTM5. Ohconfucius 06:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.