The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected to parent article. ➨ REDVEЯS looks at danger and laughs his head off 11:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Breegulls[edit]

Breegulls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unimportant element of a video game series. No merge is required. --- RockMFR 23:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable video game species; only one sentence is actually about the subject of the article, the rest is about some boss character that happens to be a Breegull. - Icewedge (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Icewedge. No encyclopedic value here whatsoever. JuJube (talk) 02:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete page blanked by author. JuJube (talk) 00:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Wikipedia isn't a game guide. Stifle (talk) 08:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This can never be more than a dict-def, except for original research. List of characters in the Banjo-Kazooie series already covers the characters. – sgeureka ^t•c 17:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable. I CSD-ed quite a few similar entries last night. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 22:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many people search for this concept. Also I think that many people should know that it doesn't really exist. Also It can be a lot more better. I think a different tag should be put on suggesting to make the page longer. Like the tag that says the article is extremely short. It can be a lot better and I know it. I just need the help of other contributers. I know it wasn't you that put it up for the articles of deletion but I think doing this is a mistake. Normally I would not act this way. Normally I am fine when my page is deleted. I think that this article is a lot better than most other articles that I create. Also I think that many people want to know farther what a "breegull" is. I really think it should be taken off of the articles of deletion. Almost everyone that I know wanted to know more about breeguls. Me too!! I wanted to see what a real breegull looked like. Then after farther research I realized that it was only a creature in the Banjo-Kazooie and Viva Pinata universe. So I searched it here on Wikipedia. I figured out know such page existed so I decided to create the page for the better of Wikipedia. I highly suggest the tag be taken off by and admin. Thank You. (author)--Anfish (talk) 16:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: It seems that the author wishes to delete the article, plus what JuJube, Stifle, Sgeureka and J.dalanoy said. תחי מדינת ישראל (talk) 04:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No I did not!!!!! Nevermind Just delete it. I don't like the page anyway. Go ahead tell an admin to delete it.>:(--Anfish (talk) 13:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of characters in the Banjo-Kazooie series#Kazooie. Seeing as Kazooie is often referred to as "Breegull" and all, this might be a better idea. .:Alex:. 16:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its me the author of the article. I have made a redirect on Breegulls. So now that the information is gone and now that it is a redirect the discussion over its deletion is over. Thank you all.--Anfish (talk) 21:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.