The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brentford F.C. Kits[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unencyclopedic. Stating on the club's main article that they have always played in variants of red and white stripes is more than sufficient, we don't need a separate article devoted to what is essentially a huge gallery of every minor variant on that theme. ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. This article is nothing more than an unencyclopedic photo gallery. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not relevant for an encyclopedia. For precedent, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Bradford City kits. Giant Snowman 17:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We do strive to be the sum of all human knowledge, but this is just petty. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 19:33, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a fine piece of work, on an interesting and worthwhile subject. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It would be interesting if there were anything of interest there. All there is is a collection of images which actually tell you nothing. "Wow, the stripes were slightly wider in 1992 than they are today!" Whoop-dee-doo! Delete – Pee Jay 22:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- @ArtVandelay13, see WP:ILIKEIT. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 04:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.