The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jamie^☆S93 00:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Cannon[edit]

The article is in pretty bad shape, but the subject has won a number of "titles" and such. Not being a wrestling fan, I can't tell if they are important or not so I am bringing this to AfD with the hopes that someone knowledgeable can opine (and hopefully fix the article if worth saving). I remain neutral at this time. ThaddeusB (talk) 03:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 03:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Web search for "Brian Cannon wrestling" gives predominantly links to Brian Pillman, known by the nickname "loose cannon," and Brian Mailhot, who portrayed a character in WWE called "Palmer Cannon." Hideous article. Most of the pictures it uses are also pretty clearly publicity images that I very much doubt are free. The wrestling companies mentioned in the article are not notable - the only one I actually recognize is Osaka Pro Wrestling, a company that's basically famous for being a joke. Cannon has on occasion appeared for the much-more notable Ring of Honor, but not on a regular basis. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 03:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And the same search with quotes around "Brian Cannon" return a whopping 352 hits. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~User:Ohconfucius has nominated the article for speedy deletion under G11. This process may be moot. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 06:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)~~ Not speedied. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 06:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP is not myspace nor a webhosting service for people's resumes. This totally unsourced, self-promotional article is full of WP:NPOV problems so bad we might as well start from scratch if it is found that he is notable. Ohconfucius (talk) 06:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPEEDY DELETE whoppingly not notable. JBsupreme (talk) 07:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly not notable. Why are we wasting our time with an AFD - this is clear CSD stuff. Half of the page also looks like a copyvio. --Cameron Scott (talk) 07:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Per Nom. Afkatk (talk) 10:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.