The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Britani Bateman[edit]

Britani Bateman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find secondary coverage of her. I actually am the person who created the article back in 2009. I have since come to feel that we some of those past decisions were unwise. In this case Bateman had a second role in Mobsters and Mormons but I have not come up with any reliable source coverage so I think we are best off with scrapping the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• The earliest version of this article did have additional sources. I am not sure why they were removed. I am also not sure how much they would qualify as reliable or third party in some cases. It did give us a lot more information on her than the current version. I am unconvinced though that there were ever enough sources on the article to pass the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:26, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete When even the creator regrets shining a light, it's time to fade back into the shadows. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep: I am voting "Weak Keep" pending some clippings from WP:RX. The subject has had a number of supporting roles in moderately notable films, so an argument could be made for WP:NACTOR. My vote will ultimately depend on the sourcing and whether it meets WP:GNG. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Here are the sources I mentioned above: here, here, here, here and here. Please note that the third and last source are mere mentions. The other three sources do provide some coverage—but is that coverage in-depth enough for the purposes of WP:GNG? Personally, I'd let the article stand and am satisfied with voting "Weak Keep", but I encourage feedback from others on the sources. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only one of these sources that might be enough is the Salt Lake Tribune one, and that is a very passing mention. The other sources are routine local coverage of local stage productions, that is not the stuff notability is made of. One source is not enough to pass GNG, which requires multiple sources. I am also unconvinced any other role besides her role in the RM is enough to count as a significant role in a major production.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• John Pack Lambert, what you say regarding GNG may be true, but I'm going to keep my vote as it is and see what others have to say. Dflaw4 (talk) 10:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as A7. ⌚️ (talk) 19:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I restored it back to how it was before stubefied.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.