The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Britsound[edit]

Britsound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Notability - this is not a "movement" that exists.

The opening sentence, which says it all really, reads: "Britsound is the name given to label British music acts originating from the UK (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales)." No, it's not. It's a name invented by a single US-based DJ, which is not used by anyone except him to describe a movement. As for the tautology of "British music acts originating from the UK (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales)"... Malcolm Starkey 12:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No reliable sources, questionable notability (at best). Caknuck 15:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:V, seems more like a neo to me. /Blaxthos 17:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This term is not in common use, and no evidence has been provided that it reflects the perceptions of musicians or fans in the UK or abroad. --Metropolitan90 17:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note -- if it were a phrase used only by Americans to refer to British musicians, it still might be notable as such. I don't think this one is, but one need not belong to a group to give it a name. --Dhartung | Talk 20:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.