The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is a strong consensus to that effect and no arguments have been made to keep by reference to relevant inclusion standards. Mkativerata (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brockham FC[edit]

Brockham FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable local amateur football team. Mo ainm~Talk 17:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This club has reached atleast a minimum amount of notability. enough to grant an article on wikipedia.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was your 7th separate Keep !vote at AfD in 11 minutes have you even looked at these articles or did you just go around on a 'keep' spree? Mo ainm~Talk 12:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no explanation how minimum notability is met. WP:JUSTAVOTE. LibStar (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Mo ainm~Talk 17:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No RS, no evidence of notability. Jimmy Pitt talk 21:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete nothing in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 13:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - doesn't play at a high enough level. GiantSnowman 17:09, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - doesn't play at a high enough level of the English football league system, no evidence of coverage to get through GNG -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:38, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per reasons above -- no evidence of notability. Obamafan70 (talk) 20:42, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Level 12 of the English football league system isn't high enough. Argyle 4 Life^talk 20:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - There are other Football clubs around this level with articles, and this team are obviously progressing. They have been established over 100 years, and now play in the SSEC which has a wikipedia page. Finally, the information is credible as it has been taken from their official website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daves here (talk • contribs) — Daves here (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Note: first ever edit by above editor, who also removed two other editors' comments from the page -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no coverage in third party reliable sources. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.