The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 07:30, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce S. Allen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think the subject is non-notable and the article hopelessly promotional. The very purpose of the honorary consulate is apparently promotion, I have had numerous communications including an OTRS complaint from the representatives of the subject trying to tailor the article to his liking. I give up on it. DGG ( talk ) 18:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revoke credentials and expel Helicopter-like attention from at least one and probably several COI-SPA's ensures that if there was anything notable about the subject, it would be in the article by now. One would think that an aspiring diplomat -- even an honorary one -- would know better than to embarass himself like this (or in the alternative, would know better than to allow his boosters to embarass him in this way). EEng (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with above - border line but if he's being a nuisance that would tip it for me. For his own good, of course Egg Centri c 21:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.