The result was delete. Lack of WP:V and WP:RS remains an issue for the article. Pigman☿ 23:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax (and/or) Theory of Rex Gilroy (and/or) non-noted creature. Seems all referring back to a line in a book (2006) Dinosaurs: Dead Or Alive?. No reliable sources offered and none can be found. Single mention in a book, no news articles, no scholarly articles and no web mentions I can see outside a small circle of crypto zoologists. Fails to be a subject that is any way verifyable Peripitus (Talk) 09:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just because this cryptid is little known and primarily researched by a man whom many think might be insane does not make it a hoax. It is not a hoax. Just google it if you must, its noy a hoax, and I believe at least marginally desrving of its own Wikipedia page. Spykeesam (talk) 20:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
===Burrunjor===
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Subject lacks any kind of notability or coverage in reliable sources. The page's only reference is to a blog. Meatsgains(talk) 01:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]