The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, with thanks to Bakazaka for providing sources. (non-admin closure) Cabayi (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bury Him Among Kings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of, or claim of, notability. Nothing found in a google search other than retail links. Cabayi (talk) 09:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 09:29, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NBOOK#1. Added references and quotes from reviews in The New York Times, Publishers Weekly, and Kirkus Reviews, all admittedly not easy to find with a Google search. Bakazaka (talk) 01:47, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bakazaka. Satisfies NBOOK with multiple book reviews. James500 (talk) 03:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.