The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CMSQLite[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utterly non-notable software with only a handful of Google hits and no coverage at all. Article is written by the author of the software. Prod has been contested twice with no reason given. Haakon (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In this case, I also cannot find independent coverage of the product. Only its own site and a non-moderated listing of PHP software. LotLE×talk 19:02, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:Reliable Sources and WP:GNG. Plus, GNews returns 0 hits. - FaceMash (talk) 14:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Many need to be Transwiki to Wiktionary as a fad and trends, since they are many Lite software appearing likewise to -zilla. (e.g. ChemIDplus Lite, EditPad Lite, Firebug Lite, iRed Lite, jCarousel Lite, K-Lite, NDS Lite, Skype Lite SQLite...etc.) --173.183.102.184 (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.