The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 04:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CVSL[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable corporation. This company name has existed for a long time (as Computer Vision Systems Lab), but it was only in 2013 that the company was bought out (essentially for its pre-existing position on the OTC markets) and completely repurposed to begin building a micro-enterprise network. Coverage that is available is mainly in the form of self-published press releases (although their bringing Kay Bailey Hutchison on as a board member generated a blip of notice). Evidence of significant third-party coverage is lacking. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-It's tough sorting through all the cruft. On a HighBeam search I found several Close-Up media articles (appears to be some sort of online trade journal?), but not sure how reliable we consider that source. I also found this Reuters story, which doesn't appear to be a straight-up press release. Beyond that, I had trouble finding more than just blurbs.EBstrunk18 (talk) 23:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:29, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 02:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think it's marginally notable. I would merge Agel Enterprises into this article because I don't think that subject is independently notable. The basket maker company appear to be. It's a holding company, and it seems to have gotten some coverage (for instance the sources cited in the Agel article). Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.