The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:48, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Callum Driver[edit]

Callum Driver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not yet played at a fully-professional level of football. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of any significant media coverage. PROD was contested procedurally, as the article had been BLPPRODED before, and because the nominator had altered the timestamp. The rationale remains valid nonetheless. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not yet meet notability guidelines as per WP:NFOOTY. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural note: a WP:BLPPROD does not prevent a subsequent WP:PROD, see my comments to the editor removing the PROD. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTBALL -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, has not played at a fully-professional level of football yet, failing WP:NFOOTY. Lack of significant coverage means he fails WP:GNG. --Jimbo^[online] 12:13, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life^talk 19:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not notable yet. Cheers! Feedintm (talk) 01:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.