The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodian New Zealanders[edit]

Cambodian New Zealanders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. a very small migrant group to NZ. unless they have done something all the article really states is there are 8,600 of them. LibStar (talk) 06:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Not a significant migrant group and certainly a lack of notable persons who fit this category. Ajf773 (talk) 06:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as failing to meet WP:GNG. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:53, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.