The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Everybody agrees this fails WP:FOOTY, but there is disagreement on whether it meets WP:GNG due to other sources presented here. Numerically, there might be enough deletes to call this a consensus to delete, but I don't see any of the delete arguments specifically addressing why the presented sources are not enough to meet WP:GNG. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Carter-Vickers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD with reason that Noted Carter-Vickers presence on the bench for Tottenham Hotspurs vs AS Monaco. This adherts to Wikipedia's notability requirements for sports players. The notice for deletion is no longer required. However, there is nothing notable about being on the bench and played fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. This article is just too soon. Qed237 (talk) 13:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Qed237 (talk) 13:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. Kante4 (talk) 13:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -he fails NFOOTBALL but he definitely passes GNG. Joeykai (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: How does he pass GNG? --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Not sure he meets WP:GNG. Definitely fails WP:NFOOTBALL. – Michael (talk) 01:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Some sources for why I think he meets GNG. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. He was also in this Under Armour ad. Joeykai (talk) 01:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - some of the 5 references above are routine, however number 1 in particular meets WP:GNG, and possibly 2 and 3 as well. Here's another [6]. I assume his 5 appearances on the US Olympic squad playing in 2015 CONCACAF Men's Olympic Qualifying Championship doesn't quite meet WP:NFOOTY. Nfitz (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG --NextGenSam619^t@lk 07:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't think he meets NFOOTBALL either but he definitely meets the GNG with articles specifically about him in the AP (reprinted in numerous other sources including the Boston Globe and Yahoo Sports), Sports Illustrated, Vice, and NBC, all major media sources: [7], [8], [9], [10]. Those alone I think are sufficient but there's plenty of other mentions in reliable sources: [11], [12]. Not qualifying for NFOOTBALL doesn't disqualify him under the GNG. FuriouslySerene (talk) 15:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 05:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 05:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 05:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC per [13], [14], [15]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per FuriouslySerene fails WP:NFOOTBALL but passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Fails NFOOTY, but passes wider GNG. Significant, non-routine coverage can be found in the sources above which, although there is some routine transfer / contract alk, also contain lengthy interviews and pieces on his career to date. Fenix down (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article is well sourced but doesn't pass NFOOTY. Don't see as just why he's American playing in the premier league makes the subject pass GNG. Subject will most likely meet either requirements in the near future but per WP:CRYSTAL that isn't really a valid reason to keep it. Open to changing my opinion though. Inter&anthro (talk) 03:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.