The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references. – Eastmain (talk) 15:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @234 · 04:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I linked to the reservoir which it mentioned, and that didn't have a page yet; there's clearly some local Roanoke coverage that would be notable (reservoirs running dry!) that would provide some context for this. Needs work on the surrounding articles. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 05:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Historic (1925) and well established summer camp that has received substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.