The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Campaigns of Pharaoh and Cleopatra[edit]

Campaigns of Pharaoh and Cleopatra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just a repetition of trivial game guide information on the Pharaoh and Cleopatra games. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTGUIDE; it's just a game guide. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT as Game Guide. Eusebeus (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:NOTGUIDE as stated above, and WP:N. — Dorvaq (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Transwiki'd to StrategyWiki:Pharaoh/Walkthrough and StrategyWiki:Cleopatra: Queen of the Nile/Walkthrough. -- Prod (Talk) 05:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominated for WP:CSD#A5 as it has been thus Transwikied. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 06:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Apparently this wasn't valid because the AfD is ongoing. Regardless, now that it's been transwiki'd I think deletion is all the more apparent a solution. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:NOT#INFO, WP:GAMECRUFT, WP:NOT#GUIDE. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 00:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – the same reasons Sephiroth mentioned above. MuZemike (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable split from an otherwise notable game. Fails to meet the WP:GNG. No need to merge, since this violates WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:PLOT by going into excessive detail beyond what would be necessary to address the main article. Randomran (talk) 01:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Wikipedia:Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Wikipedia is. Sufficient editor and reader interest and notability/verifiability, so at worst a legitimate search term that could be merged and redirected without deletion, though I'm for keeping. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 03:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.