The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canon FD 300mm f/2.8 S.S.C. Fluorite[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a single model of camera lens; notability is low and I don't think the encyclopædia ought to be a catalogue of all manufactured products. bobrayner (talk) 02:58, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that this does not appear notable. Perhaps a list of lenses rather than a page for each would be more suitable? Millermk90 (talk) 04:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Rename and expand to cover all the 300mm lenses perhaps? The Canon FD 200 mm lens page looks like a useful way to go, then you could also apply consistent approach across the other pages in Category:Canon FD lenses - Hunting dog (talk) 14:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We are not a tech spec page, by any stretch, either. There has to be some reason why this particular camera lens is notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sigh. We need notability guidelines for products. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete as a lacking sufficient in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:45, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete non-notable product review.DaveApter (talk) 15:53, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
merge to a suitable combination page (or if this is deleted, simply write one about , say Canon telescopic lenses ) DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.