The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, with no concensus to redirect. If someone wants to pursue a merge/redirect or redirect proposal, please do so on the talk page (and not through AfD) - WP:MERGE and WP:REDIR have info on the process involved. - Daniel.Bryant 10:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Rue[edit]

Caroline Rue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Despite the fact that she was in Hole for a short period and left after recording one album, we know nothing about this woman, who she is, and where she is now, there is also no information available about her from any sources besides being in Hole (I think). Nothing in this article can't already be said on "Pretty on the Inside" or "Hole (band)". I mean, the only reason way someone will look up this person is by clicking on a link on Pretty on the Inside or Hole out of curiousity on who this woman is. But once they click, they won't see anything they haven't already seen on Pretty on the Inside or Hole, I suggest a redirect to Hole (band). FlareNUKE 06:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep I agree with the nominator that there isn't much info on her. I found some verifiable references and posted them at the article, but even cummulatively the information is not significant beyind establishing her as a prominent member of a notable band. I found equally scant information that she was involved in one other band after Hole. I think that she was noticed, which is the definition of notability. Is there value to a separate article and can that ever be more than a stub? I see little harm in leaving what we have, and referencing readers on to Hole wiht the hope that more information can be found. --Kevin Murray 19:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per the prolix nom. There is no information in this article that's not in the main Hole (band) article. YechielMan 19:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per YechielMan. --Dhartung | Talk 01:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Kevin, possibly early close since no one's recommending a deletion. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.