The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cash Suvidha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May fail at WP:ORGCRITE. Not enough coverage in reliable and independent sources. Hitro talk 18:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - startup not yet notable per WP:CORP. The only coverage I can find online is passing mentions, some niche blog coverage, plus the usual puff pieces that startups routinely feed to the financial press about how experienced and awesome their CEO is. Wikishovel (talk) 11:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non notable company, WP:TOOSOON fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- "minor-tech-startup" spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete New company still need to prove its worth even the encyclopedic standards. Light2021 (talk) 20:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Start-up company that currently fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:31, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.