The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Theology of the Body[edit]

Catholic Theology of the Body (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The contents of this article appear to be original research. While it quotes much Catholic writing (and the quotes are supported by references), the interpretations (what ideas are included with the "Catholic Theology of the Body" or even whether this is a coherent topic separate from JPII's speeches—which are covered in their own article Theology of the Body) are completely unsupported. LyrlTalk C 23:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article states that "The 1950 dogma of the bodily Assumption of Mary, is the latest dogmatic manifestation of the Catholic Theology of the Body". There is no reference to support the claim that the Assumption of Mary is part of the "Catholic Theology of the Body".
  • The article says, "Early Church Fathers wrote on the role of the body and its relation to the soul." Undoubtedly true. But there is no source to support that the writings of Ambrose of Milan, Augustine of Hippo, and Thomas Aquinas are considered to be part of the "Catholic Theology of the Body".
And on and on throughout the entire article. The statements in this article are well-referenced, but the claim that they are viewed by the theological community as part of the "Catholic Theology of the Body" is WP:OR. Even the article itself seems to have trouble with this assertion: the phrase "theology of the body" appears only once in the entire article, in the first sentence! Should someone point out to me a book or article discussing this concept of "Catholic Theology of the Body" (as distinct from JPII's lectures) I would happily withdraw my nomination.
Should others view this as an obviously coherent topic (even lacking any sources treating it that way), an alternative to deletion would be a rename to a descriptive title (lowercase letters only); treating the title as a proper noun is probably the largest part of the OR in this article. LyrlTalk C 02:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Theology of the Body mentioned here, is an admirable, very powerful commercial product advertised by Christopher West and others[1][2][3][4] It refers mainly to views expressed by Pope John Paul II in a series of 129 lectures. They are sold in book form and CD versions and numerous seminars and meetings. The Wikipedia article called Theology of the Body, (April 7, 2005) attempts to describe these 129 lectures of John Paul II, focusing mainly on contraception and less on theology. Some would like to reserve the title ToB to themselves (and the commercial products), which seems to be in part the concern here. Ambrosius007 (talk) 09:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


There is more than the product ToB. Wikipedia Category:Theology of the Body lists 19 pages, of which Catholic Theology of the Body is just one. The issue here is deletion. Therefore, all questions of detail I would be delighted to discuss on the talk page of Catholic Theology of the Body, where they belong, such as the mistaken accusation of original research. Thank You. --Ambrosius007 (talk) 11:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)--[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.