The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Deltaspace42 (talkcontribs) 14:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cdrdao[edit]

Cdrdao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero independent reliable sources covering this software. Not notable. Changed my opinion after the major work done by StreetcarEnjoyer (thank you!), now I don't think it should be deleted. I believe I have the right to withdraw the nomination since both people here are leaning towards keeping. Deltaspace42 (talkcontribs) 14:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did what I could. Hope this helps. It was mentioned in enough books and articles that makes me think it's notable. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.