The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Kurykh (talk) 00:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cebuano Wikipedia[edit]

Cebuano Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only claim to fame is its high number of articles. Other than that, no evidence of significant coverage in third-party sources. feminist 09:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. feminist 09:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. feminist 09:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List_of_Wikipedias - No evidence of notability however consensus is more or less to redirect these so redirect. –Davey2010^Talk 18:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Wikipedias. no evidence whatever of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The cited sources are all Wikimedia Foundation web pages, apart from an interview, on a site dedicated to promoting Cebuano, with the person largely responsible for building Cebuano Wikipedia. Nor do my searches provide anything better. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Wikipedias per above. This Wikipedia, despite its high number of articles (although there's a reason for that, but that is outside the scope of this discussion), simply has not received enough significant coverage in reliable sources, even Philippine ones (note that Philippine online media is mostly in English). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.