- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Cecilie Broch Knudsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Poorly sourced WP:BLP of an artist and academic. This just states that she exists, and references the fact solely to a (deadlinked) primary source on the website of the institution where she works. As always, "she exists, and here's a staff profile on the website of her own employer to prove it" is not in and of itself grounds for a Wikipedia article -- she needs to be reliably sourceable as passing one or more specific notability criteria in WP:NARTIST and/or WP:NACADEMICS, but nothing like that is being shown here at all. Bearcat (talk) 14:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics or artists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, well sourced as per WP:GNG. In the current revision, refs # 2, 5 and 6 are in-depth and non-trivial, and I could dig up more. Geschichte (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think this meets WP:NACADEMIC #6, as the former rector of Oslo National Academy of the Arts and Geschichte has expanded the article a great deal with references. Mortee (talk) 18:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Hmlarson (talk) 23:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Passes WP:NACADEMIC.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.