The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G12 as unambiguous copyright infringement. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Certified Bitcoin Professional[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references and no indication of notability. In the absence of any references, there is no indication that third-party sources have referred to this designation. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.