The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 19:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chal Jhoothey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTAL. No useful details or references to determine notability Night of the Big Wind _talk 23:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Void coverage in the reliable, independent media—notability is in question. — Bill william compton^Talk 11:57, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment I was tempted to delete this but while there is evidence of a lack of sourcing, its not clear what searches for sources have been tried and there is no explanation of why the subject fails crystal. Comment on this would make the consensus clearer. Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Crystal requires the event is notable and certain to take place. There is no claim for notability, and the is no confirmation of production. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 07:36, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.