The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changeling (Eberron)[edit]

Changeling (Eberron) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

More maintenance tags than you can poke a stick at. Yet another personal essay on a D&D character class which says nothing much beyond what you'd find at changeling. Guy (Help!) 18:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - another badly-written article about a subject of very limited interest. Deb (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 19:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the directly above comment...--Camaeron (talk) 21:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no assertion of real-world notability, only sources are game manuals, pure game guide material. --Stormie (talk) 23:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. March is D&D Spring Cleaning Month; you can help. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Multiple maintenance tags make a bad article do not. References in the process of being added, looking for proof of notability, otherwise perhaps merge into the main eberron page?--Hazel77 (talk) 09:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No secondary sources, no sourced assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No sources. --MisterWiki humour talking! :-D - 15:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect into Eberron. BOZ (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not Merge: Changelings already have a paragraph devoted to them in the Eberron article, same as the other three Eberron-specific races; any more than that would be undue weight. --Ig8887 (talk) 19:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is just one of thousands of non-notable stock characters with no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside D&D canon. An article like this with a heavy in-universe perspective treats the fictional narrative as it it were the real thing, but completely ignornes the requirements of WP:WAF for real-world context and sourced analysis. There is no content worth merging or keeping.--Gavin Collins (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Send in Majik XII. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v :L13 ½-Raichu Soulknife)} 09:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — non-notable. shadzar-talk 21:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.