The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 15:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changning (prince) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is NOT INHERITED Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 07:21, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've added the extra information to the page. It should make the article look less stubby and more clearly not a candidate for deletion. Madalibi (talk) 08:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. frankie (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. frankie (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Philosopher Let us reason together. 11:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.