The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Wright_Flyer_III#Flying_at_Kill_Devil_Hills. SarahStierch (talk) 16:39, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Furnas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He was the first airplane passenger, flying with both Orville and Wilbur Wright. Interesting, yes; notable, no. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did give him a mention in Aviation#History. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. If all he's chiefly known for is in relation to his participation with the Wright Flyer III, then a redirect would probably be a good idea. (Or if you want to get specific, to Wright_Flyer_III#Flying_at_Kill_Devil_Hills.) So far I don't see where he's overwhelmingly notable for anything else. It's definitely amazing, but not independently notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Wright_Flyer_III#Flying_at_Kill_Devil_Hills. I did a search and I don't see where Furnas was independently notable outside of his famous flight with the Wright Brothers. There's enough reason to believe that this could potentially be a search term and since he was the first passenger, a redirect to the article about the Wright Flyer III would be appropriate.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect: Clearly not notable enough for his own article. HairyWombat 06:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, I second the suggestion of Tokyogirl79. Cavarrone (talk) 18:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.