The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charmed Sisters Cloned[edit]

Charmed Sisters Cloned (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I'm not quite sure, because I don't watch the show, and this article is so badly written as to be almost incoherent, but doesn't this content already exist at Prudence_Halliwell, Piper Halliwell and Phoebe Halliwell and a string of other Charmed pages? Not sure that this article is notable enough beyond the other pages. Ged UK (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Very badly written article with lots of non existent pictures too (deleted due to non free content). Contributed on by only one user. - tholly ^--Turnip-- 18:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Let this be a lesson that using Wikipedia to write an article in fanfiction form is very ill advised. What a mess, and I don't think this has any connection to the actual series at all. Nate • (chatter) 20:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete From what I can tell by the redlinks, this is a copy of some charmed-wiki or something. No notability, no need for it to be here. -Verdatum (talk) 21:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per others. I don't think this is original fanfict, but it appears to be a list of minor alternate versions of major characters that appeared in single episodes. The concept of grouping them together and labeling as "clones" may tread in OR territory however, and much of the content appears to be a fan's commentary on their appearance and mannerisms. I see nothing to merge, so deletion is appropriate. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• "Perky and Sexy Prudence"? Surely original research. ;-) Delete. Axl (talk) 14:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.