The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheapfareguru.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no coverage for this website. However, the only reviews from users that I can find call this company a scam operation. Fails WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 04:35, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 04:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't pass the notability test and reads like an "About us" page on the site itself. Wikipedia is not AboutUs.org or dmoz. --Kimon^talk 12:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Note that if it is indeed a scam, and if it becomes a notable scam, then it might end up meriting an article as a high-profile scam. Scams need love too, sometimes. But not this time, I don't think. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:42, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and Kimon. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 22:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Newsjunky12 (Talk) 00:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC) Proud member of the Association of Deletionist Wikipedians.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.