The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea McEachran[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod replaced with malformed AfD for some reason. Initial concerns still valid. Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Don't know why you messed around with the Prod, but ye, clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Govvy (talk) 10:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet notability guidelines for footballers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 16:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly does not meet WP:GNG, and has the nom pointed out, fails WP:NFOOTY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:25, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY comprehensively. At the age of 15 this is obviously WP:TOOSOON, article can always be recreated if/when subject meets said requirements. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As others have said does not currently meet notability standards and a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. Dunarc (talk) 23:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.