The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai Swaggers[edit]

Chennai Swaggers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough to have a article GreenCricket (talk) 06:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Article needs improvement but searches find large number of sources from India and internationally. AusLondonder (talk) 03:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep keep it with banner showing it needs improvement, but it meets notability requirements.VanEman (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as doesn't meet any notability guidelines, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.